Revista Multidisciplinaria Perspectivas Investigativas
Multidisciplinary Journal Investigative Perspectives
Vol. 4(1), 12-20, 2024
Reconstruyendo la Identidad Docente: Un Viaje Narrativo a través de la Vida de Angelito
Reconstructing Teacher Identity: A Narrative Journey through the Life of Angelito
Franklin Marcelo Sánchez-Pástor
Alba Susana Valarezo-Cueva
15
the reality he was telling us. Reflecting on this aspect, we strived to prevent our fascination and
admiration for Angel from diverting the focus of our research. In this sense, the reflections of
(Mattos-Medina et al. 2011) lead us to consider some fundamental characteristics for
researchers.
Sensitivity, derived from the active interaction of the researcher in the environment; adaptability,
which facilitates a more complete immersion in the situation, allowing the simultaneous
management of different types of data and the ability to adjust behaviour and intuitions in the
face of new demands or changes in the environment; and the ability to observe holistically,
using all capacities (affective, physical, emotional, ideological, etc.), are essential elements for
the researcher. These qualities collaborate from a global perspective to integrate the emerging
knowledge in the research context (Mattos-Medina et al. 2011, p. 105).
In this way, we sought to balance the emotions experienced during the interviews with the
structure outlined in the methodological process. Simultaneously, while absorbing Ángel's
account, we took concise notes in a notebook, detailing his reactions when addressing aspects
related to his personal, family and professional life. These concise and succinct notes recorded
the impressions and feelings he expressed during the talk. At the end of each interview, these
notes helped us to recount the experience and enabled reflection on the development of both
the researchers and the interviewee. Over time, greater comfort was evident on Angel's part,
and his account became more profound (Mattos-Medina et al. 2011, p. 105).
We also faced concerns during the interview transcription procedure. By listening to our own
voices, the questions asked and, especially, the moments when we intervened and interrupted
the story, we identified aspects to take into account for future interviews. From these reflections,
we recognised the importance of allowing space for the silences inherent in the dynamic
between interviewers and interviewee. We also recognised the importance of allowing the
interviewee to articulate his or her thoughts without substantial interruptions, and of minimising
the importance of comments that, from our perspective as researchers, might divert the
narrative towards different stories, possibly related to our own personal experiences. We also
understood that the questions posed by the researchers should emerge from the interviewee's
account and not so much from an outline previously elaborated by us as researchers (Mattos-
Medina et al. 2011, p. 105).
A fundamental choice in this procedure has been to determine how to end the interviews.
Despite the fascination that Angel's story generated in us, the commitment to finish the
Postdoctoral project within specific deadlines led us to communicate that the conclusion of the
interviews took place during a fourth meeting (Mattos-Medina et al. 2011, p. 101).
Experiencing the in-depth interviews
The methodological approach has focused on the execution of in-depth interviews. According to
Prados et al. (2012), the in-depth interview is presented as an arena for the exchange of
reciprocal knowledge, where relationships explain and argue the construction of subjectivities
that are intertwined in the practice of knowledge and the understanding of professional contexts
(p. 149). The relationship established between the participant and researchers has created
several encounters, fostering an atmosphere of listening, sensitivity, empathy and respect.
These interviews have provided the opportunity to explore aspects of Angel's life that contribute
to understanding the historical and social environment in which she existed and developed
personally and professionally.
The interview, conceived as a conversational space and as a possibility to create and recreate a
dialogue, has been the central component of the methodological process. In turn, this process
articulates and reflects a fundamental epistemological and ethical vision in working with
biographical accounts (Leite, 2011, p. 183).
At the beginning of the research, the completion of the interviews was agreed with Angel
according to the requirements of the study. As previously mentioned, all meetings took place in