Effects on the health of workers in a poultry
farm
Efectos en la salud de los trabajadores de una avícola
Gustavo Alberto Chiriboga-Larrea
pg.docente19@uniandes.edu.ec
Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES,
Ambato - Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-668X
ABSTRACT
The
objective of this research is to determine the effects on the respiratory
health of workers in a poultry farm that provides private services in Ecuador.
Methodologically, it was carried out under a descriptive quantitative approach.
A significant association was observed between the position in the institution
and the occurrence of respiratory diseases such as discomfort and nasal
obstruction, showing a higher rate in the assistant poultry workers with 29%,
poultry workers (16.1%), miscellaneous services (9.7%) and miller (3.2%).
According to the results obtained, the low frequency of occurrence of symptoms
of pulmonary and respiratory diseases, as well as other syndromes related to
the respiratory system, were in agreement with the results of spirometry and
chest X-rays, which showed no alterations in the poultry workers.
Descriptors: health
education; safety
education; food
production. (Source:
UNESCO Thesaurus).
RESUMEN
La investigación
tiene objetivo determinar los efectos en la salud respiratoria de los
trabajadores de una avícola que presta servicios privados en Ecuador.
Metodológicamente fue realizado bajo un enfoque cuantitativo de tipo
descriptivo. Se observó una asociación significativa entre
el cargo en la institución y la ocurrencia de enfermedades respiratorias tales
como molestias y obstrucción nasal, mostrándose un mayor índice en los
ayudantes de galponero con un 29%, galponeros (16,1%), servicios varios (9,7%)
y molinero (3,2%). De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos en cuanto a la baja
frecuencia de ocurrencia de los síntomas de enfermedades pulmonares,
respiratorias, así como otros síndromes relacionados con el sistema
respiratorio estuvieron en consonancia con los resultados de la espirometría y
radiografías de tórax, las cuales no mostraron alteraciones en los trabajadores
de la avícola.
Descriptores: educación sanitaria; enseñanza de medidas de seguridad; producción
alimentaria. (Fuente: Tesauro
UNESCO).
Research articles
section
INTRODUCTION
Poultry farming in Ecuador has grown during the last
decades (Palma-Avellán, & Sabando-Mendoza, 2023),
but information on the impact of occupational exposure to organic dust on the
respiratory health of workers is scarce (Rojas-Viteri, & García-Prieto,
2015). This activity includes permanent labor, which generates a large amount
of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) that constitutes an important risk in
the occurrence of acute or chronic respiratory, dermatological and ocular
problems. In poultry production units, the poultry worker is a worker who can
be flexible, adaptable and constantly learning the development of poultry
breeding (Souza, & Alexandre, 2012), and who is exposed to occupational
hazards due, among other causes, to the fact that there is little rotation in
their workplaces, which translates into a danger in the development of
occupational diseases (Delpont, et al. 2021).
Broiler-type chicken farming has become the main
poultry activity due to the fact that this type of poultry has a high fattening
rate and good resistance to environmental conditions; however, in these
activities there is constant exposure to risk factors throughout the process,
such as variations in temperature and relative humidity, oxygen renewal and
harmful gases, not only in the birds but also in the workers (Dos-Anjos-Magri, et
al. 2021).
On the other hand; (Shen. et al., 2018),
determined that the air quality in the sheds inhabited by the birds is very
varied, and depends a lot on the location, being higher its concentration of
particulate matter of 10 micrometers (PM 10) in the morning in the rear and
middle zones, while the front zone the air quality is acceptable. In addition,
the presence of ammonia as a product of organic decomposition of feces should
be considered. Exposure to the risk factors present in sheds can cause severe
lesions in the upper respiratory system, generating long-term chronic effects
on the respiratory tract, with recurrent respiratory symptoms, pulmonary
diseases, among others.
It is important to highlight that complementary
tests should be used in the evaluation of pulmonary problems. According to
(Yasmeen et al. 2020), in a study conducted in Pakistan in poultry
workers subjected to spirometry, they determined that 14% of the population
studied had a medium pulmonary obstruction, with the oldest workers having the
lowest lung capacity. The prevalence of farmer's lung disease ranged between
0.2-1.5%.
Based on the above, the objective is to determine
the effects on the respiratory health of workers in a poultry farm that
provides private services in Ecuador.
METHOD
The present study was conducted under a
quantitative, observational, descriptive and cross-sectional approach; in which
the effects of continuous exposure to particulate matter (organic dust) on
health were evaluated in a poultry company that provides private services in
Ecuador.
This company is made up of 4 farms, with a balanced
production area and a dispatch area for which it has a total of 31 workers, who
in total made up the study population.
The study included all the workers of the company
because no non-occupational chronic disease had been diagnosed. All
participants included in the study signed the informed consent form to
guarantee their free will to participate, as well as the confidentiality of the
information obtained.
The measurement of air quality was made based on the
quantity and size of particulate matter (organic dust) from litter, feathers,
poultry manure, using an air quality detection equipment (Mod. HT-9600). The
measuring equipment for sample collection was placed in an open space to avoid
blockage of the sensors and the measurement was taken after 50 s. The result of
each measurement was expressed as a percentage of the total air quality. The
result of each measurement was expressed in μg/m3 of particulate matter. Samples were taken
at the entrance and exit of the shed at three times during the working day
(morning, noon and afternoon).
For the collection of information, a standardized
epidemiological questionnaire of respiratory symptoms ATS-DLD-78-A
(Orduz-García, et al., 2013) was applied, which collects information on
respiratory signs and symptoms that allow determining a diagnosis of
respiratory disease in the work area. Additionally, spirometry, standard chest
X-ray and updating of occupational medical records were performed on each of
the workers.
The commercial name of the poultry farm was kept
anonymous, with the intention of maintaining their privacy, and the data
collected were used only for scientific purposes.
Descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi-square were
applied, supported by the SPSS V25 statistical package, and are presented in
the results section.
RESULTS
According
to sociodemographic data, 74.2% of the workers are male, with an average age of
38.5 years and an average height of 1.6 meters. Regarding marital status, the
highest percentage (58.1%) is married, followed by 25.8% in union, while a
lower percentage of workers are single (9.7%), divorced (3.2%) and widowed
(3.2%). In terms of educational level, 58.1% have primary education, 22.6% have
university studies, 16.1% have secondary education and only 3.2% have a
technologist's degree.
Similarly,
there are certain processes that must be managed or headed by trained personnel
because they are more specific. For example, 25.8% of the staff are warehouse
workers, and they in turn have warehouse assistants who make up 29% of all
employees.
Regarding
the results obtained after the application of the standardized epidemiological
questionnaire of respiratory symptoms ATS-DLD-78-A (Mohandas, et al. 2019), a
very low or no occurrence of symptoms of cough, expectoration, exacerbation
episodes, wheezing, dyspnea and common cold (influenza) was observed in the
different workers of the poultry farm (graph 1). Of the total number of
workers, only 1 case (3.2%) presented with expectoration and 4 cases (12.9%)
with common cold, while the rest of the symptoms were not observed.
Graph 1.
Frequency of occurrence of
different respiretory symptoms ATS 78 derived from
continuous exposure to dusts in Poultry.
Source:
Own elaboration.
Table 1. Frequency of occurrence of
respiratory diseases in relation to the worker's age group.
|
Grupo
etario |
|
|
||
|
<30 |
31-40 |
>40 |
Total |
Chi
cuadrado de Pearson |
Si presenta alguno de los
síntomas |
3
(9,7%) |
9 (29%) |
6
(19,3%) |
18
(58,1%) |
0,227 |
No presenta ningún síntoma |
2
(6,4%) |
4
(12,9%) |
7
(22,6%) |
13
(41,9%) |
-- |
Total |
5
(16,2%) |
13
(41,9%) |
13
(41,9%) |
31(100%) |
|
Source:
Own elaboration.
Table 2. Frequency of
occurrence of respiratory diseases in relation to the worker's age group.
|
Grupo etario |
Chi cuadrado de
Pearson |
||
|
< 30 años |
31-40 años |
>41 años |
|
Molestias en una de sus fosas
nasales |
3 (9,7%) |
9 (29,0%) |
6 (19,4%) |
0,227 |
Obstrucción nasal sin otros
síntomas |
3 (9,7%) |
4 (12,9%) |
3 (9,7%) |
0,404 |
Rinorrea |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Disfagia |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Dolor en algún lugar de su cara |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Source:
Own elaboration.
No significant association was detected with the
age group of the workers; again, it is evident that there is a greater
propensity of people older than 31 years to present this type of disease (Table
1), (Table 2).
Table 3. Frequency of occurrence of respiratory diseases in relation to the
time spent in the workplace.
|
Tiempo
de permanencia en el trabajo (años) |
|
|
||
|
1 –
5 |
>
6 -10 |
>10 |
Total |
Chi
cuadrado de Pearson |
Si presenta alguno de los
síntomas |
8
(25,8%) |
6
(19,3%) |
4
(12,9%) |
18
(58,1%) |
0,813 |
No presenta ningún síntoma |
7
(22,6%) |
3
(9,7%) |
3
(9,7%) |
13
(41,9%) |
-- |
Total |
15
(48,3%) |
9
(29%) |
7 (22,6%) |
31 (100%) |
|
Source:
Own elaboration.
Table 4. Frequency of occurrence of respiratory
diseases analyzed separately in relation to the time spent in the workplace.
|
Tiempo de permanencia en el trabajo (años) |
Chi cuadrado de Pearson |
||
|
1-5 años |
>6-10 años |
>10 años |
|
Molestias en una de sus fosas nasales |
6 (19,3%) |
8 (25,8%) |
4 (12,9%) |
0,813 |
Obstrucción nasal sin otros síntomas |
3 (9,7%) |
5 (16,1%) |
2 (6,5%) |
0,647 |
Rinorrea |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Disfagia |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Dolor en algún lugar de su cara |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
-- |
Source:
Own elaboration.
It was found that people with working time between 1-5 years and 6-10
years had the highest percentages of occurrence of respiratory disease (Table
3), (Table 4).
On the other hand, a significant association was observed between the
position in the institution and the occurrence of respiratory illnesses such as
nasal discomfort and obstruction, with a higher rate in the following
positions: assistant storekeepers (29%), storekeepers (16.1%), miscellaneous
services (9.7%) and miller (3.2%).
According to the results obtained, the low frequency of occurrence of
symptoms of pulmonary and respiratory diseases, as well as other syndromes
related to the respiratory system, were consistent with the results of
spirometry and chest X-rays, which showed no alterations in the poultry
workers. In addition, in the updated medical history, the workers did not
report any type of acute or chronic pathology related to those described in the
present study.
DISCUSSION
Activities that
generate particulate matter (PM) in poultry production cause health problems in
those exposed, whether at the ocular, respiratory or dermal level, and these
pathologies can become chronic in workers. Particulate matter (PM) in poultry
production units varies in size, density and composition, which can affect
workers' health in different ways. This dust, which commonly originates from
poultry waste, fungi and feathers, is biologically active in that it contains
microorganisms that increase the risk of various respiratory diseases. In
addition, this dust can combine with ammonia, a common contaminant in this type
of poultry activity, and can cause acute or chronic respiratory diseases
including chronic bronchitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, occupational asthma
and toxin fever (Just, et al. 2009), (Huneau-Salaün,
et al. 2019), (Wagner, et al. 2017).
In another order;
(Hamid, et al., 2018), showed a low prevalence of symptoms evidenced by
16.9 to 31% of workers who showed eye problems (tearing, redness and itching),
while respiratory symptoms included wheezing due to colds or not (18, 3 and
1.4%, respectively), chest tightness (16.9%), shortness of breath together with
chest tightness (9.9%), regular breathing difficulties (14.1%) and cough
(15.5%), while 21% presented "obstructive" lung function.
Contrary to other
studies, in the present article the most frequent respiratory symptoms found
were nasal discomfort and obstruction, ocular pruritus, lacrimation and skin
irritation. These symptoms completely subsided after the end of exposure, so it
is presumed that these symptoms are due to the use of the protective and
biosafety equipment used (Bedekelabou, et al.
2022). No chronic pathology such as cough, neoplastic effusions, superior vena
cava syndrome or hypersensitivity pneumonitis, as reported in previous studies,
was determined in any of the workers. Spirometry and chest X-rays performed on
the workers in the present study yielded normal results, unlike the results
obtained by (Yasmeen, et al. 2019), who found 14% of workers with a
pulmonary obstruction pattern.
CONCLUSION
A
significant association was observed between the position in the institution
and the occurrence of respiratory diseases such as nasal discomfort and obstruction,
with a higher rate in the following positions: assistant storekeeper (29%),
storekeeper (16.1%), miscellaneous services (9.7%) and miller (3.2%). According
to the results obtained, the low frequency of occurrence of symptoms of
pulmonary and respiratory diseases, as well as other syndromes related to the
respiratory system, were consistent with the results of spirometry and chest
X-rays, which showed no alterations in the poultry workers. In addition, in the
updated medical history, the workers did not report any type of acute or
chronic pathology related to those described in the present study.
FINANCING
Non-monetary
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest with persons or
institutions related to the research.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Universidad
Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES, Ambato - Ecuador.
REFERENCES
Bedekelabou, Andre, Talaki, E.,
Dzogbema, K. F., Dolou, M.,
Savadogo, M., Seko, M. O.,
& Alambedji, Bada. (2022). Assessing farm
biosecurity and farmers' knowledge and practices concerning antibiotics and
antibiotic resistance in poultry and pig farms in Southern Togo. Veterinary
world, 15(7), 1727–1737. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1727-1737
Delpont, Mattias, Guinat, Claire, Guérin, Jean-Luc, Le
Leu, Vaillancourt, Jean-Pierre, & Paul, Mathilde. (2021). Biosecurity
measures in French poultry farms are associated with farm type and
location. Preventive veterinary medicine, 195, 105466.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105466
Dos-Anjos-Magri, Claudia, Garófallo Garcia, Rodrigo, Binotto, Erlaine, Duarte-da-Silva-Lima, Irenilza,
Sgavioli, Sarah, & de-Castro-Burbarelli,
María. (2021). Occupational risk factors in health of broiler-farm workers: A
systematic review. Archives of environmental & occupational health, 76(8),
482–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2020.1832036
Hamid, Almas, Ahmad, A.,
& Khan, N. (2018). Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm
Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms. Brazilian
Journal of Poultry Science, 20(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513
Huneau-Salaün, A., Puterflam, J., Balaine, L., Galliot, P., & Le Bouquin, S. (2019).
Exposure to inhalable dust of workers shackling birds frequently exceeds
occupational exposure level in abattoirs in Western France. British poultry
science, 60(4), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2019.1614529
Just,
Natasha, Duchaine, Caroline, & Singh, Baljit. (2009). An aerobiological
perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Journal
of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 4,
13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-4-13
Mohandas,
Sreelakshmi, Francis, Paula, Rakesh, P. S., & Libin Antony, P. F. (2019).
Assessment of respiratory morbidity among bus drivers and conductors of the
state road transport corporation, Kochi, Kerala. Journal of family
medicine and primary care, 8(12), 3887–3892. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_548_19
Orduz-García,
Carlos, Toro, María, & Gómez, Juan. (2013). EPOC, bronquitis crónica y
síntomas respiratorios, asociados a la contaminación por PM10 en la ciudad de Medellín
(Colombia) [COPD,
chronic bronchitis and respiratory symptoms associated with PM10 pollution in
the city of Medellin
(Colombia)]. Revista Med, 21(1),
21-28.
Palma-Avellán, Ana,
& Sabando-Mendoza, Estela. (2023). Producción y consumo avícola en Manabí.
Una comparación interna entre demanda y consumo [Poultry
production and consumption
in Manabí. An internal comparison between demand and consumption]. 593
Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(3), 777-793. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.3.1822
Rojas-Viteri,
Luis, & García-Prieto, Amalia. (2015). Caracterización de la exposición a
polvo orgánico en el área de producción de alimento balanceado y granjas
avícolas en la empresa “Megaves Cía. Ltda.” [Organic dust exposure characterization in the area of balanced diet
production and poultry farms of the company “Megaves Cía Ltda.”]. Siembra , 2(1),
44-50. https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v2i1.129
Shen, D.,
Wu, S., Dai, P. Y., Li, Y. S., & Li, C. M.
(2018). Distribution of particulate matter and ammonia and physicochemical
properties of fine particulate matter in a layer house. Poultry science, 97(12),
4137–4149. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey285
Souza,
Ana, & Alexandre, Neusa. (2012). Musculoskeletal
symptoms, work ability, and disability among nursing personnel. Workplace
health & safety, 60(8), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507991206000805
Wagner,
Susanne, Angenendt, Elisabeth, Beletskaya,
Olga & Zeddies, Jürgen. (2017). Assessing ammonia emission abatement
measures in agriculture: Farmers' costs and society's benefits – A case study
for Lower Saxony, Germany. Agricultural Systems. 157, 70-80.
10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.008.
Yasmeen,
Roheela, Zulfiqar, Ali, Tyrrel, Sean, & Nasir,
Zaheer. (2020). Assessment of Respiratory Problems in Workers Associated with
Intensive Poultry Facilities in Pakistan. Safety and health at work, 11(1),
118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.12.011
Bajo la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0
de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0